Discussion about this post

User's avatar
WoodPig Press's avatar

Interesting piece, Marcel. For me, energy consumption is only one issue with AI. If what you say about the energy consumption worries being overblown is true, then I'd love to see it used responsibly for beneficial purposes that did not steal intellectual property and undermine creative livelihoods.

But why are these figures so at odds with those that warn of the environmental impact? Is this just two sides of a propaganda war?

Expand full comment
Thibault's avatar

Hi Marcel, I recently read this article from MIT https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117

I think indeed individual consumption isn’t where “the problem” is with its 0.2kwh, but I also agree with the MIT article that combining the hype, low energy usage and commodity a ChatGPT request is becoming over a simple web search is just fuelling the energy hungry training of new models in the ratrace. No incentive for day to dat users to be conscious about their AI usage, reinforcing the “model factory” of OpenAI, Anthropic and the likes.

What do you think? Curious to know

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts